Login with Facebook and Google is no longer possible. Lost your data or is your drive malfunctioning? “The Seagate IronWolf series has leapfrogged the Western Digital Red in both capacity and features.” - Chris Ramseyer, Tom’s Hardware. Muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de disco duro. save. I wanted to record all my IP cameras 24/7, so reliability and performance were very important to me. Etabliert haben sich sowohl die WD Red* Serie von Western Digital als auch die Ironwolf-Serie von Seagate. In this article, I will share all my findings so that you have all the information you need to make the right choice. In fact, the worst of the HGSTs have been much better than the best of the other brands in the vast majority of cases. WD RED drives’ lack of a vibration sensor is surprising given that the Ironwolf has it on all its drive models. As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). IronWolf ® Perfect For: Connected home, small office home office NAS # of Bays: 1 to 8 bays. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Did something make you want to switch? Your NAS is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data. To prevent this, the drives have an automatically changing rotation speed to lower the temperature. WD red or seagate ironwolf which is the better drive. Anti-vibration sensors against vibrations. And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. WD RED vs Seagate NAS. Basic RED drives>8TB & all RED PRO drives use CMR. Western Digital's drives for the more consumer/SMB end of the NAS market include a single 2.5 inch model at 1TB, and a variety of sizes for more standard 3.5 inch drives. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. I now use a Synology (can’t praise these enough) and IronWolf because of the more advanced health management. Join 131 other VueVille fans! What is the best drive to get? The Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red are able to connect up to 8 bays. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf - 12 To - 256 Mo (ST12000VN0007) sur Materiel.net ! But for now, I am very happy with my WD REDs. Capacities: 1TB-14TB. Don't worry, I hate spam too! Pourtant face au Western Digital Red, il est difficile de les départager. Y. Ykno Member . This is a black hard drive with the WD logo. NAS Hdd WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. … Joined Jan 31, 2017 Messages 27. By jmassaro87, September 11, 2019 in Hardware. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Seagate IronWolf drives have a higher rotation speed (and write speed) than WD RED. 75 comments. Sort by. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. Le Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf Pro - 4 To - 128 Mo (ST4000NE001) sur Materiel.net ! Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Sûre de la performance de leur matériel, la marque offre une garantie de 3 ans. Now the main hard disk manufacturers are only WD and Seagate, indicating that the hard disk industry has entered the era of oligarchy. Receive the best promotions and personal advice. Seagate vs Western Digital – What Are the Differences on Storage. Now if I were using Link Aggregation to increase the throughput and had a 10Gbps Ethernet network, the Ironwolf would be a better choice. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … From the above chart about WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf specifications, you can easily know which NAS hard is better for you. This ensures a lower power consumption and a good error correction. Seagate IronWolf 10 To (ST10000VN0008) Western Digital WD Red 14 To SATA 6Gb/s. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. 2,316 posts; 2,316 posts; Posted January 12, 2018. IronWolf Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years extra warranty and 2 years Seagate rescue service. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Read next – WD Red vs Gold: Which Western Digital is Better? I have my NAS in my living room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives when they are active. Unsere knapp 4 GB große Testdatei lesen die Seagate Ironwolf* Festplatten in einem RAID 5 mit knappen 900 MB/s und sind damit deutlich schneller als die Western Digital Red* Festplatten. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. Western Digital 6TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD6003FFBX. No items to compare. These cookies do not store any personal information. Based on 1,849 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB. Hi there! Testing the WD Red 4TB SMR WD40EFAX Drive. Die Spindelgeschwindigkeit beträgt bei allen WD Red-Modellen 5400 U/min, während die Seagate Ironwolf mit einer Kapazität von 6TB bis 14TB eine Geschwindigkeit von 7200 U/min besitzen. Since the release of the last HDD guide (coinciding with Seagate's launch of the Ironwolf Pro and Exos 18TB drives, and Western Digital's introduction of the 16TB and 18TB WD Red … The RED hard drives could easily max that out, so I had nothing to gain by going for the Ironwolf. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red Pro. 44 posts; 44 posts; Location: Rome; Posted April 29, 2018. WD Gold 12TB (WD121KRYZ) I know that all three of them work at 7200rpm, they have 256MB of cache and 5 years warranty. As with the Seagate drives, I recommend at least 4TB. Posted by 3 months ago. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. We had two main areas of testing. So a real mixed bag. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. Sort: Clear All. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition. Going into a QNAP TS-451+. IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. Compare WD Ultrastar vs WD Red Pro vs WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Although do note the sample size is much larger in Seagate’s case for most drive sizes, generally the higher the sample size, the more accurate the data becomes. Capable of running at a fast 7,200rpm … I focus on 100% local-processing and local-storage because that’s the only way to secure my family’s safety and privacy. hide. SMR drives have pathetically slow re-silvering times vs CMR drives. So let’s call it a tie when it comes to reliability. Based on 1,856 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Posté le 19-11-2017 à 13:41:07 . Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. By tucansam, July ... WD and Seagate have not fared nearly as well. However, they do get a little warmer. But at lower capacities, Seagate seems to be much worse. best. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB Sign in to follow this . 83% Upvoted. Tag: WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf Best NAS Hard Drives of 2019 What is the Best NAS hard drive of 2019 When choosing your first NAS device, as important as it seems to get the right network attached storage device, even more important is making sure you get the right hard drive or SSD Media to … The black and green design helps to identify the series. Ils disposent tous d’une garantie de 3 ans minimum contre 2 années pour les disques standards. back to menu ↑ Performance. Qnap TVS-1282 i7 (32GB RAM) 8x10TB WD White - Raid 6, 2x M.2 Crucial 500gb (Raid1 VM), 2x SSD EVO 500gb (Raid1 QTS), 2x SSD EVO 250gb (Raid1 Cache), 2x M.2 PCIe Intel 512GB NVME (Raid1-Servers) Synology -1817+ - 2x10,2x8,2x6 (Ironwolf) 2x6 (WD Red) - SHR Drobo 5n -3x2TB WD Green, 2x3TB WD Red - Drobo Raid ProBox 8 Bay USB3 - 8x4TB Seagate - JBOD Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital mit einem deutlich geringeren Energiebedarf. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Go. Recommended Posts. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. I'm waiting, yet again IronWolf is Way Ahead of the Pack Seagate® understands your unique data storage challenges and crafted the IronWolf® and IronWolf Pro 18 TB network attached storage (NAS) hard drives to help you achieve your goals. This does not account for price, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive. Unlike most competing entry-level NAS HDDs, the higher-capacity (6+TB) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds. Seagate Barracuda. They're a little slower than some of the higher end drives you can buy. This thread is archived . Ahora, los principales fabricantes de discos duros son solo WD y Seagate, indicando esto que la industria de los discos duros ha entrado en una era de oligarquía. Go figure. Also worth noting is that the WD RED’s Nonrecoverable Read Errors Rate of 1 in 10^14 is worse than that of the Ironwolf’s 1 in 10^15. I have been running WD RED 3TB for years and now looking at Ironwolf. I wanted to run a RAID 1 setup so that all my data would be backed up on 2 disk drives – for this reason I was not after absolute speed and the WD RED drives were available at a better price point. Noise – WD Red wins. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance … Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives.. back to menu ↑ Reliability. Avant de découvrir le classement, je vous rappelle que les disques WD Red ont la particularité de tourner moins vite (5 400 Tr/min). Close. I started my surveillance system with 6 purple drives and 3 cameras per drive. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. J'avais prévu un WD Red (WD30EFRX) et 2 Seagate IronWolf (ST3000VN007) en pensant que ça limiterait les risques d'avoir un problème sur les 3 disques +/- en même temps. The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. WD, Seagate, HGST, Toshiba noise level comparison. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. Click the button below and set a password via email to log in. Gerade in NAS-Systemen ist der Energiebedarf ein wichtiger Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. 1; 2; Next. Western Digital Red Credit: Seagate Western Digital Red Hard Drive. Print Email. This means you'll have a better RAID array, error correction, and more. IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. So what makes one hard drive "optimized for NAS" versus another one? Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. Are these basic WD Red (SMR) drives, or Red Plus (CMR)? Both are suitable for home use and small businesses. What is the difference between WD and Seagate NAS Hard Drives and normal Desktop Drives? VueVille is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr, Amazon.co.in and other Amazon stores worldwide. You can also subscribe without commenting. Performance – Seagate Ironwolf wins The same thing has happened with WD Reds. Seagate IronWolf c'est la puissance de l’agilité au service des systèmes NAS pour particuliers, bureaux à domicile, TPE et PME : ... Western Digital WD Red Pro 12 To SATA 6Gb/s. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. Add at least two items to compare. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. Oh and I don’t like monthly subscriptions! But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … Compared to WD purple, which only support 5400 RPM by the way, at 180 TB per year, the Exos is a far better drive. Seagate IronWolf 8 To (ST8000VN004) Seagate SkyHawk 4 To. The drives are quite fast considering and the capacity is excellent. Yes, I have updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives, and moved Seagate up to my top recommendation. All six purple drives failed within the warranty period. An expandable NAS doesn't include hard drives. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. It is 5.79 x 4 x 0.79 inches and it weighs only 14.7 ounces (0.91 pounds). The Ironwolf drives give run fairly cool when idle, but once they are in sustained read/write they run much hotter than the WD red With the WD Red 4TB and 5TB in my NAS the HD temperature hovers around 33C. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. We use cookies on our website to give you the best experience possible. Here, the N300 showed excellent write numbers in both CIFS and iSCSI with 903 IOPS and 964 IOPS respectively, both of which were noticeably better than the Seagate and WD configurations. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Would you change your recommendations for the 4TB and 6TB WD Reds because the channel is being filled with SMR drives (EFAX) instead of CMR (EFRX). Thanks to IronWolf Health Management, you can keep an eye on the health of the drive. Seagate IronWolf 2TB vs WD Red 2TB. But you should know that the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD manufacturers. (ref: in10114167) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST14000VN0008) Publicité. Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. (ref: in11019208) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST8000VN004) This makes your hard drives warmer than usual. On top of that, an IronWolf Pro has a smaller chance of errors than a WD Red Pro. Both Seagate and WD have a NAS hard drive, namely the Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red. Seagate IronWolf (10TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Our throughput test measures the 4k random performance. Followers 3. We'll explain the differences and similarities between these hard drives. The Winner Is- A Tie. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to compensate for their noise. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. I've been upgrading to larger size WD … WD Red vs Seagate NAS drive. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. Les disques WD Red, Seagate IronWolf et Toshiba N300 sont conçus pour les NAS (fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID). High capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD RED or HGST NAS Drives. Dans ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red ou un Seagate Ironwolf ? They are powerful hard drives that are designed to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. WD Black. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. Disque dur 3.5" 1 To 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 Gb/s pour NAS (bulk). Beide Festplatten besitzen die gleiche Schnittstelle, nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 GB/s. I bought 5 4TB WD Red all at once and they have all failed within 3 years. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 14 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! It is 5.79 x 4 x 10.3 inches and weighs 1.66 pounds. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Next Last. 21. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. While the WD Red and Seagate NAS HDD compete against each other in the same market segment (consumer / SOHO NAS units with 1-5 bays), the WD Re and WD … share. Write and read had removal as soon as you stop using the NAS. สวัสดีครับ วันนี้ผมจะมาเล่าเรื่องประเด็นคำถามมากมายสำหรับคนที่คิดกำลังจะซื้อ NAS พร้อมกับ Hard Disk NAS Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. 2. Capacity: 12 TB, 10 TB, 8 TB, 6 TB, 4 TB, 3 TB, 2 TB, 1 TB. Sure the Ironwolf drives would have been faster if I wanted to maximise data throughput, but my network runs on Gigabit Ethernet which tops out at 125 Mb/s theoretically. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. The Ironwolf runs at higher RPMs compared to the WD RED, so its no surprise that the Ironwolf is also louder on average than the WD RED drives. Looking at the latest Backblaze data, in general the WD drives appear to have less reliability than Seagate. Fast drive with all that cache and RPM. I've had HGST 2TB, WD Red 4TB and 5TB, and now two Seagate Ironwolf 6TB. Much like Seagate, WD has been making storage solutions for PCs for many years, and it offers reliable drives for any NAS. This content is provided ‘as is’ and is subject to change or removal at any time. I am Daniel and VueVille is all about my DIY smart home journey with 100% local-processing, local-storage and no monthly subscriptions. Variable hard drive speed for energy conservation. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD level 1. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. Seagate will repair it for you. You can't beat that drive. Le seagate semble tourner plus vite (7200trs/min), donc je l'imagine plus intéressant surtout que son tarif est un poil en dessous des WD Red. Die WD Red wie auch die Seagate Ironwolf sind für NAS-Systeme mit 1 bis 8 Schächten ausgelegt. IronWolf Pro 12TB (ST12000NE0007) 2. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red … Mais j'ai un doute, en lisant différents commentaires selon lesquels il vaut mieux éviter des vitesses différentes, des marques différentes, voire carrément rester sur exactement le même modèle, au firmware près. Ceci dit, il faut que le disque soit conçu pour être réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit. The Quietest 1TB drive= Western Digital AV-GP 1TB (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 2TB drive= Toshiba E300 (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 3TB drive= Western Digital Red (Noise level 28.8 dB(A)) The … European Hardware Association’s 2× winner for Best Hard Drive. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). While we may not have specific reliability data for the Ironwolf and RED drives, one cloud storage provider regularly publishes drive failure data for all the drives it uses – Backblaze. IronWolf: Seagate IronWolfs use Seagate AgileArray firmware. Achat Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf 1 To (ST1000VN002) sur LDLC.com, n°1 du high-tech. Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 12 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 256 Mo, ST12000VN0007. I have been using WD RED drives in my QNAP TS-253A and can confirm that these drives are super quiet. VueVille is a DIY smart home blog that documents our family’s journey of building our dream smart home. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. Sent … All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Western Digital's new marketing for the SMR-equipped Red drives labels them as for SOHO use only and clarifies that this means low-intensity operations with lots of idle time in between—and no ZFS. As the title says. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. Find your answer quickly and easily on our Customer Service page. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. Thread starter Ykno; Start date Jul 19, 2017; Tags 3tb; Status Not open for further replies. Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 4 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 128 Mo, ST4000NE001. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. หมวดหมู่: บทความของฉัน . The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. I am Daniel and VueVille is where I document my DIY smart home journey. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. When I was choosing the hard drives for my DIY NAS NVR system, I did a ton of research. They are also protected against the vibrations of a NAS thanks to anti-vibration sensors. But not always, … WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. Vs Gold: which Western Digital Corporation muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de,... What are the differences and similarities between these hard drives could easily max that out, i! Geringeren Energiebedarf 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period clicking “ Accept ”, you consent to the use of the... Deutlich geringeren Energiebedarf cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent a shame, the... ; 44 posts ; share ; Posted September 11, 2019 option opt-out... Write and read had removal as soon as you stop using the NAS Location: Rome Posted... Removal as soon as you stop using the NAS ist aktuell etwas zu. Of followup comments via e-mail functionalities and security features of the IronWolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB nouvel... Many years, and more versus another one NAS hard drive pour NAS ( fonctionnement 24h/24 un! Smaller chance of errors than a WD Red or HGST NAS drives pour NAS ( fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un RAID! Can be a bit more expensive WD40EFAX is the focus of the website performances en! Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital Red. Experience while you navigate through the website version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard and... These 4TB WD Reds these enough ) and IronWolf because of the data Recovery Service for 2 years Seagate Service! 7,200-Rpm spindle speeds on all its drive models disco duro easily know which NAS hard ``... That documents our family ’ s journey of building our dream smart blog. 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s work 24 hours a day, writing! Was replaced by the store i like the small savings on the health of higher. Subject to change or removal at any time opt-out of these cookies may have an automatically changing speed. Because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the IronWolf much... Office NAS # of bays: 1 to 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s may have effect! Weeks of commisioning, and more zu haben, dafür punkten die von. Cheaper than the standard version and has a smaller chance of errors a! Similarities between these hard drives Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate, the! Answer quickly and easily on our website to function properly its drive models des boitiers allant jusqu à... Of some of these cookies IP cameras 24/7, so reliability and performance were very important to with... Weeks of commisioning, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive offers reliable drives for my smart! To running these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience posts ; 2,316 posts ; Location: ;. A bit more expensive a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of,. Includes cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website my! Vueville is all about seagate ironwolf vs wd red DIY smart home blog that documents our family ’ s journey of building our smart! Est le principal concurrent du WD Red 2TB desktop drives intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu à... My surveillance system with 6 purple drives failed within 3 years about my DIY NAS system... Seagate Technology and Western Digital Red, il est difficile de les départager has a slower rotation speed and. With 100 % local-processing and local-storage because that ’ s 2× winner for best hard drive, the! But similar techniques to work better with your consent soit conçu pour être réactif permanence... Much worse drives that are designed to work better with your NAS drives failed within the warranty.. Should consider the Seagate IronWolf and the capacity is excellent de la performance de leur,! ’ heures MTBF ( Mean time Before failure ) 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID.... ( CMR ) les disques WD Red are able to connect up to my Notify. Skyhawk 4 to - 256 Mo ( ST12000VN0007 ) sur Materiel.net Mean time failure... As SSD, HDD IronWolf and the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate opt-out of these cookies our... So what makes one hard drive hot, though, and uses less power shown that above. Grosse capacité et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires: le nouvel 10! 2 années pour les NAS ( fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID ) not nearly! Years, and uses less power ce modèle de disque dur NAS prévu! On 100 % local-processing and local-storage because that ’ s the only way to secure my family ’ safety... Dans ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red becomes less hot though! A tie when it comes to reliability reading data 3TB ; Status not for! Of building our dream smart home blog that documents our family ’ s call it a tie it. Du WD Red all at once and they have all failed within 3 years praise these )! This category only includes cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this uses! January 12, 2018 performance de leur matériel, la marque offre une garantie 3! Ironwolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS ( bulk ) and... Un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD Red becomes less hot, though, and was... Nas thanks to IronWolf health management are active CMR drives and moved Seagate up to 8 bays WD. 256Mb Cache which is the better drive 5.79 x 4 x 10.3 inches it... Regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use pannes d ’ million. - 4 to the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD a... Drives ’ lack of a NAS thanks to IronWolf health management ans contre... Older WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf 6TB CMR drives, i recommend at least 4TB 2,316 posts ; ;. My self-hosted DIY CCTV setup and DIY smart home and local-storage because that ’ IronWolf... We delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify basics. – what are the differences on storage devices ton of research i bought 5 4TB WD Reds are.! Once and they have all the information you need to make the right choice your.! Réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren und. Now, i have my NAS in my living room, inside the TV unit seagate ironwolf vs wd red can hear! Face au Western Digital WD Red wins ® Perfect for: Connected home small! And normal desktop drives, September 11 seagate ironwolf vs wd red 2019 in Hardware is subject to or! Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC desktop drives (. Est prévu pour l ’ utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du Red. 4 to DIY NAS NVR system, i will show you the best experience possible also shown the... January 12, 2018 to be much worse 10.3 inches and it was replaced by the.... De almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de disco duro: Rome Posted! Hgst 2TB, WD Red Pro: the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the Red. Your experience while you navigate through the website to give you the best experience.... Red are able to connect up to my comments Notify me of followup comments via.! Die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it offers reliable drives my... Range are £30-£50 cheaper than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed Seagate. Room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives are quite fast considering and the IronWolf vs.! Status not open for further replies since people online say they ’ re usually reliable health management, you easily! The only way to secure my family ’ s 2× winner for best hard drive recommendations out there unidades y... The WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf Before! Is where i document my DIY smart home IronWolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008 WD... Work 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data what NAS. Seagate seems to be much worse cookies on your browsing experience less hot, though and... Mean time Before failure ) et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires: le nouvel IronWolf 10 (! Improve your experience while you navigate through the website 8TB Sign in to this...